[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Handling of sponsorship requests



On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 12:06:27AM +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> Hello list,

Hello!

> 
> as sponsor I realy welcome the decission and changes to handle
> sponsoring requests about our bugtracker, but there are still two
> questions/disadvantages from my side:
> 
> a) How should we handle requests, where the maintainer *may* be MIA?
> Just for an example #658114 - a realy simple question is unanswered for
> about 6 months!

IMHO, let the mentors-reaper-bot kill the package from mentors after a
few months, and then poke the bug as incomplete / moreinfo, and then
close the bug after $TIME

> IMO they should be pinged one more time, maybe they have overseen the
> response, but if I want to see a package in Debian, I would track it, so
> I also would see such "maintainers" as possible MIA candidates just
> after their first uploads. So on they may be not qualified to maintain
> packages/bugs within a distribution.

Here here!

> 
> b) Should we assume that the uploader is aware about freeze and realy
> delay typical "new upstream release" uploads to unstable? IMO I do not
> think so. The process is a bit more complicated but it is still possible
> to update testing packages without unstable upoads.

Yeah, but it's a major PITA and involves a lot more work (and sometimes,
lost history if it's updated out of sync with unstable)

> Surely it is not the cleanest way but sponsorship requests should be
> processed :)

Sure, but might as well throw them up in exp. I mean, it's easy, and fun
for the whole family :)

> 
> 
> Personaly I would not sponsor packages in the a) case, so on I think
> they should be closed and some more active and interested mentor could
> do this job.

+1.

> 
> b) is controverse when testing is freezed, but the number of requests
> will just grow and grow! Maybe also some warning to the uploader like
> "we are frozen, please only upload important bugfixes to sid if
> required, if not please use experimental"

Yeah, mentors has this warning, where else would you suggest putting it
to make sure people, well, read it? :)

> 
> -- 
> /*
> Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards,
>  Patrick Matthäi
>  GNU/Linux Debian Developer
> 
>   Blog: http://www.linux-dev.org/
> E-Mail: pmatthaei@debian.org
>         patrick@linux-dev.org
> */
> 

-Paul

-- 
 .''`.  Paul Tagliamonte <paultag@debian.org>
: :'  : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'`  4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352  D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
 `-     http://people.debian.org/~paultag

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: