Bug#682680: RFS: clean-compiler/2.4-1 [ITP] -- The Clean language compiler
package sponsorship-requests
severity 682680 wishlist
user sponsorship-requests@packages.debian.org
usertags 682680 not-fit-for-wheezy
thanks
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 04:55:49PM +0200, Patrick Uiterwijk wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages]
Normal, for a new package? (I'm correcting that now; also setting
not-fit-for-wheezy because it's a new package and thus cannot get a freeze
exception.)
> * Package name : clean
Your ITP is for clean-compiler. What's the difference about?
> * URL : http://wiki.clean.cs.ru.nl/
> * License : GPLv2
The upstream page says "The Simplified BSD License applies to the libraries,
runtime system and examples, the LGPL to the rest." Your copyright file
doesn't specify GPLv2 either. Where do you get GPLv2 from?
> Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
>
> dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/clean/clean_2.4-1.dsc
Where did you download the original source tarball from? Your copyright file
is vague about that. In any case it's none of the source tarballs downloadable
from the location given:
$ md5sum clean2*tar.gz Clean2.4Sources.tar.gz clean_2.4.orig.tar.gz
b715e981dc1ef6702c2f670ad888f9af clean2.4_64_boot.tar.gz
558dc5c85322617ea7138a9a6838c89f clean2.4_boot.tar.gz
9474bfb60959a825fac883399a4812ce Clean2.4Sources.tar.gz
de86967b3ea208017e1c32a8fbeaf7b0 clean_2.4.orig.tar.gz
How do you plan to handle compiler bootstrapping?
(That's it for now. I'll do a more thorough review once these questions have
been addressed.)
--
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho, Jyväskylä, Finland
http://antti-juhani.kaijanaho.fi/newblog/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/antti-juhani/
Reply to: