[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#681020: RFS: radeontop/0.5.4+1-gf2c42f4-1



Hi John,

I am also interested in radeontop, and was going to file an ITP, but it
seems you got there before me. :-)

On 10/07/12 01:17, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>   I am looking for a sponsor for my package "radeontop"
> 
>  * Package name    : radeontop
>    Version         : 0.5.4+1-gf2c42f4-1
>    Upstream Author : Lauri Kasanen <curaga@operamail.com>
>  * URL             : https://github.com/clbr/radeontop
>  * License         : GPLv3
>    Section         : utils

I've had a look at your package, and I can see a number of
issues/niggles:

general:	* FTBFS because of missing Build-Depends: on 
		  libncurses5-dev and pkg-config.
		* Are you building the package in a clean chroot?
		  (pbuilder, cowbuilder sbuild etc?)

d/control:	* Remove Vcs-Browser if you don't plan on using it.
		* "It comes with a manpage" in the package description
		  isn't very useful. It is expected that programs come
		  with manpages. :-)
		* Multi-Arch: foreign -> radeontop is not a -dev or
		  support so this is not needed.

d/README.Debian:* This states that this tarball was packaged from
		  commit gf2c42f4, but I can't find any such commit
		  upstream.
		* If this tarball is actually 0.5.4.1, it should be
		  packaged from the tagged commit 2ebfb800e2 instead.
		* If you do switch to using upstream tarballs, drop
		  README.Debian totally.

d/copyright:	* The GPLv3 license is indented by too many spaces.

d/rules:	* Remove the dh_make boilerplate
		* Is export debug=1 required for the build? If not,
		  remove it.

Jon



Reply to: