Bug#680193: RFS: gnustep-base/1.22.1-3 [RC]

To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#680193: RFS: gnustep-base/1.22.1-3 [RC]
From: Yavor Doganov <yavor@gnu.org>
Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2012 14:44:42 +0300
Message-id: <87ipe3hhsl.GNU's_Not_Unix!%yavor@gnu.org>
Reply-to: Yavor Doganov <yavor@gnu.org>, 680193@bugs.debian.org

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important

Dear mentors,

I'm looking for a sponsor for my package "gnustep-base".
This upload would fix #667868.

http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnustep-base/gnustep-base_1.22.1-3.dsc

Changes since the last upload to unstable:

gnustep-base (1.22.1-3) unstable; urgency=low

  * debian/patches/libobjc4.patch: New; fixes FTBFS with gcc-4.7 (Closes:
    #667868).
  * debian/patches/series: Update.
  * debian/control.m4 (libgnustep-base`'SOV_BASE-dbg) <Recommends>: Add
    libobjc4-dbg as alternative.
  * debian/control: Regenerate.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Bug#680193: marked as done (RFS: gnustep-base/1.22.1-3 [RC])
  - From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)

Prev by Date: Re: [Multiarch-devel] Proper upgrade path for lib32v4l-{0,dev}?
Next by Date: Bug#679420: marked as done (RFS: pdfposter/0.5.0-1)
Previous by thread: Re: Who maintains manpages.debian.net?
Next by thread: Bug#680193: marked as done (RFS: gnustep-base/1.22.1-3 [RC])
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread