[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#673457: RFS: psi-plus-i18n/0.15.5333.2-1 [ITP] -- translation files for Psi+



Hi,

> Yes, but for nearly all packages, they are in the source of the package
> themselves. So even if the translations are in a separate binary
> package, the source is still the same as the main package. So, did you
> consider including it in your psi-plus package?

Yes, most of sources comes with translation files. But I know few packages
in Debian with separate source package for translations (quick look gave me
18 results [1][2][3]) and believe that it is the matter of choice.

It case of my package psi-plus sources and translations come from different
locations and trey are updated independently. I see no good reason to unite
these source packages. But there is good reason for holding them separately:
package with translations can be updated when translators update their
translations (it is always happens after "release" in psi-plus project).

Regards,
Boris

[1] http://packages.debian.org/search?searchon=sourcenames&keywords=-l10n
[2] http://packages.debian.org/search?searchon=sourcenames&keywords=-i18n
[3] http://packages.debian.org/search?searchon=sourcenames&keywords=-translation


Reply to: