Bug#674997: RFS: sanlock/2.2-4 [ITP]
Hi,
[ I have no intention to sponsor this package. ]
David Weber <wb@munzinger.de> writes:
> libsanlock-client1 - client library for sanlock
> sanlock - shared storage lock manager
> sanlock-dev - development files for sanlock
The descriptions for the development and library packages are not very
informative. They give no more information then the package names
themselves, something like
libsanlock-client1 - shared storage lock manager (client library)
sanlock-dev - shared storage lock manager (development files)
would be better.
Also is there a reason why it's sanlock-dev and not libsanlock-dev?
It might also be a good idea to merge all changelog entries so you only
have the "Initial release." entry.
Ansgar
Reply to: