[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#692923: RFS: chrony/1.24-3.2 [RC, NMU]



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Hi,

Le 11/11/2012 09:00, Joachim Wiedorn a écrit :
> David Prévot wrote on 2012-11-10 17:40:
> 
>> Please use 1.24-3.1+deb7u1 as a version number (and eventually directly
>> “wheezy” instead of “testing-proposed-updates”).

> That's confusing me.

Let me try a third time then…

> What is that for a strange version numbering system?

The purpose is to indicate that the upload was targeted to Wheezy
(deb7), and it's the first one (u1), see #685646 for the rationales, or
the debian-release list archives.

> Which time is the right time to contact the release team?

Now, with a debdiff, see Rule #5

	 http://release.debian.org/wheezy/freeze_policy.html

> Now I see two ways:
> 
> a) uploading (with sponsor) to testing-proposed-updates; then ask release
>    team (as bug report) for unblocking.

Not an option.

> b) ask release team; then upload (with sponsor) to testing-proposed-
>    updates or direct to wheezy. Optionally the release team do unblocking.

Using « wheezy » in the changelog will lend in testing-proposed-updates,
don't worry about that, just ask the release-team to ACK your bug fix,
they may even sponsor directly your upload (if they don't have time,
someone else will be happy to do it promptly, me included).

Regards

David

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
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=w/jm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: