Bug#686070: libpam-ssh/1.92-15
On 11/6/12 5:13 AM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> a potential sponsor for reintroducing libpam-ssh asked me to contact you
> as previous maintainer for comments on the reintroduction version,
> which is meant to be a minimal version.
>
> A commented debdiff output is attached in such a way you can get quickly
> a picture of this minimal version.
Looks fine to me, thanks for taking care of libpam-ssh!
Cheers,
/JP
--
Jens Peter Secher <jpsecher@gmail.com>
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion.
Q. Why is top posting bad?
Reply to: