[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#674445: marked as done (RFS: ruby-juicer/1.0.16-1 [ITP])

Your message dated Tue, 16 Oct 2012 04:20:12 +0000
with message-id <E1TNydY-0008M7-3s@quantz.debian.org>
and subject line closing RFS: ruby-juicer/1.0.16-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #674445,
regarding RFS: ruby-juicer/1.0.16-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org

674445: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=674445
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages]

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ruby-juicer"

* Package name    : ruby-juicer
  Version         : 1.0.16-1
  Upstream Author : Christian Johansen
* URL             : http://github.com/cjohansen/juicer/tree/master
* License         : MIT (Expat)
  Section         : ruby

It builds those binary packages:
ruby-juicer - Command line tool for CSS and JavaScript developers
To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL:

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/ruby-juicer/ruby-juicer_1.0.16-1.dsc

More information about hello can be obtained from http://www.example.com.

Changes since the last upload:
* Initial release (Closes: #641973)

Jean Parpaillon

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Package ruby-juicer has been removed from mentors.

--- End Message ---

Reply to: