[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#688768: marked as done (RFS: glipper/2.4-1)



Your message dated Sat, 29 Sep 2012 16:20:18 +0000
with message-id <E1THzm6-0006H6-QC@quantz.debian.org>
and subject line closing RFS: glipper/2.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #688768,
regarding RFS: glipper/2.4-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
688768: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688768
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
  Severity: normal

  Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "glipper"

 * Package name    : glipper
   Version         : 2.4-1
   Upstream Author : Laszlo Pandy <laszlok2@gmail.com >
 * URL             : http://launchpad.net/glipper
 * License         : GPL-2+
   Section         : utils

  It builds those binary packages:

    glipper    - Clipboard manager for GNOME

  To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/glipper


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

    dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/glipper/glipper_2.4-1.dsc

  Changes since the last upload:

* New upstream release. (LP: #936650)
* Removed debian/patches directory. The patch is applied upstream.

  Regards,
   José Ernesto Dávila Pantoja
   http://people.ubuntu.com/~josernestodavila/gpg_key_transition.txt.asc

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Package glipper version 2.4-1 is accepted.
http://packages.qa.debian.org/glipper

--- End Message ---

Reply to: