[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: gcc-4.4-doc-non-dfsg, gcc-4.6-doc, gcc-4.7-doc, gcc-doc-defaults



Hi,

On 09/28/2012 09:02 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 28.09.2012 03:53, Paul Wise wrote:
>> Has the FSF been asked to switch to plain GFDL so that we can move the
>> GCC docs to main? They did that for the autoconf documentation
>> recently.
> 
> yes. but you may want to try again.

No matter whether they agree to change the license, I want to have gcc
document for wheezy (or rather, come with wheezy, as non-free doesn't
official belong to release). Certainly many others have the same
needs.[3-8] Thanks to Samuel Bronson and Nikita V. Youshchenko's
previous work, I updated packaging work for gcc-4.[467]'s document.
Please review them and upload if appropriate.

Git repos are also available.[1,2]

[1] git://git.debian.org/users/yixuan-guest/gcc-doc.git or
    http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=users/yixuan-guest/gcc-doc.git
[2] git://git.debian.org/users/yixuan-guest/gcc-doc-defaults.git

http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=users/yixuan-guest/gcc-doc-defaults.git
[3] http://bugs.debian.org/660955
[4] http://bugs.debian.org/619933
[5] http://bugs.debian.org/626079
[6] http://bugs.debian.org/618351
[7] http://bugs.debian.org/651290
[8] http://bugs.debian.org/684082

Regards,

Guo Yixuan


Reply to: