Bug#679594: marked as done (RFS: zgv/5.9-5 [QA] -- SVGAlib graphics viewer)
Your message dated Tue, 4 Sep 2012 10:45:42 +0100
with message-id <20120904094542.GA23066@riva.dynamic.greenend.org.uk>
and subject line Re: Bug#679594: RFS: zgv/5.9-5 [QA] -- SVGAlib graphics viewer
has caused the Debian Bug report #679594,
regarding RFS: zgv/5.9-5 [QA] -- SVGAlib graphics viewer
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
679594: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679594
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: RFS: zgv/5.9-5 [QA] -- SVGAlib graphics viewer
- From: Boris Pek <Tehnick-8@yandex.ru>
- Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2012 04:22:09 +0300
- Message-id: <2110981341019329@web29e.yandex.ru>
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for the package "zgv".
It builds binary package:
zgv - SVGAlib graphics viewer
To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/zgv
Direct link for download:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/z/zgv/zgv_5.9-5.dsc
Changes in the package:
zgv (5.9-5) unstable; urgency=low
* QA upload.
* Updated debian/watch: changed regexp.
* Bumped Standards-Version to 3.9.3 (was 3.9.2).
* Added debhelper version (9 is used); updated debian/compat.
Fixed lintian note package-lacks-versioned-build-depends-on-debhelper.
* Added file debian/source/format: format 1.0 is still used in this package.
* Patched files config.mk and src/Makefile to respect build with
hardening flags. [Thanks to Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe] (Closes: #663625)
* Rewritten debian/rules:
- now dh is used instead of direct dh_* commands
- added --as-needed option to LDFLAGS
- added section get-orig-source (uscan is used)
- fixed lintian warnings:
+ hardening-no-relro
+ hardening-no-fortify-functions
+ dh-clean-k-is-deprecated
+ debian-rules-ignores-make-clean-error
+ debian-rules-missing-recommended-target build-arch
+ debian-rules-missing-recommended-target build-indep
* Updated debian/control:
- added Homepage field
- added ${misc:Depends} to package zgv
- changed build dependency from libpng12-dev to libpng-dev
(Closes: #662575)
* Updated debian/menu: fixed lintian warnings:
- unquoted-string-in-menu-item
- menu-item-uses-apps-section
* Updated doc/zgv.1: fixed lintian notes hyphen-used-as-minus-sign.
* Deleted file debian/postinst: generated automatically.
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Best regards,
Boris
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 679594-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#679594: RFS: zgv/5.9-5 [QA] -- SVGAlib graphics viewer
- From: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 10:45:42 +0100
- Message-id: <20120904094542.GA23066@riva.dynamic.greenend.org.uk>
- In-reply-to: <2110981341019329@web29e.yandex.ru>
- References: <2110981341019329@web29e.yandex.ru>
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 04:22:09AM +0300, Boris Pek wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the package "zgv".
>
> It builds binary package:
> zgv - SVGAlib graphics viewer
>
> To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL:
> http://mentors.debian.net/package/zgv
>
> Direct link for download:
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/z/zgv/zgv_5.9-5.dsc
This looks fine, thanks - I see nothing to complain about here (well,
there's an unnecessary override_dh_strip, but it's not an actual
problem; I might do a bit more cleanup here later). I've built and
uploaded your package to unstable.
Thanks for your contribution,
--
Colin Watson [cjwatson@debian.org]
--- End Message ---
Reply to: