[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#683840: RFS: razorqt/0.4.1-1~exp1 [ITP]



please see my control file in https://github.com/mckaygerhard/razor-qt/blob/master/distr/deb/debian/control  first Manuel 

in lasted commit https://github.com/mckaygerhard/razor-qt/commit/c5985e8967a2ee6b13f91d4c506b9078a2787e62 i commented all changes about name packages follow debian policy please read it carefully 

On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montezelo@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Bart,

2012/8/4 Bart Martens <bartm@debian.org>:
> Hi Manuel,
>
> The package name is "razor-qt" on the ITP and "razorqt" on the RFS and at
> mentors.  Why the difference ?

Initially I was using "razor-qt", then tried to follow upstream's
recent names in Ubuntu's PPA:

https://launchpad.net/~razor-qt/+archive/ppa/

I don't know why they decided to change, though.

There are some advantages in not having the dash and those making
"razorqt" a "unit", for example, that it doesn't look like "Qt's
interface for package Razor", or that it helps to shorten package
names in general (eg razorqt-policykit-agent instead of
razor-qt-policykit-agent).

But in short, there's no strong reason.


Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montezelo@gmail.com>


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: [🔎] CAPQ4b8k91sT+jWTDpBB=60OmDhc+WufTNyu_1TwnEwOq5o+2-w@mail.gmail.com" target="_blank">http://lists.debian.org/[🔎] CAPQ4b8k91sT+jWTDpBB=60OmDhc+WufTNyu_1TwnEwOq5o+2-w@mail.gmail.com




--
Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
http://qglochekone.blogspot.com


Reply to: