Bug#683500: RFS: freefoam/0.1.0+dfsg-1
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 12:15:18PM +0200, Michael Wild wrote:
> Some of the bugs are fixed in the upload at m.d.n are not RC, but still
> pretty annoying. To get a freeze-exception, would I need to remove those
> changes?
What are the bug severities of these "pretty annoying" bugs ?
> Also, would this upload to to unstable, or to testing directly?
I suggest to go via unstable, because this is possible for this package.
Please mark RFS 682893 as blocked by RFS 683500 to keep unstable available.
> Lastly, what is the appropriate revision number? I chose to stick with 1
> since I added the +dfsg suffix, but I'm not sure this is appropriate
> since it is also the second revision based on the 0.1.0 upstream version.
Your choice 0.1.0+dfsg-1 is good.
Regards,
Bart Martens
Reply to: