[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: how to upgrade from sqeeze to wheezy?



Hello Igor,

This looks like it'll upgrade him to unstable, which he may not want to do.

// Alexander

(resent because I forgot to reply to the list too)

On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Игорь Пашев <pashev.igor@gmail.com> wrote:
> Here is my sources.list:
>
> deb http://ftp.fi.debian.org/debian/ testing main non-free contrib
> deb-src http://ftp.fi.debian.org/debian/ testing main non-free contrib
>
> deb http://ftp.fi.debian.org/debian/ unstable main non-free contrib
>
> deb http://www.debian-multimedia.org wheezy main non-free
>
>
> You can replace your entries with these, and command
> apt-get update
> apt-get dist-upgrade
>
> 2012/7/19 vykuntam srinivas <vykuntamsrinivas@gmail.com>:
>> hi,friends.
>> i am using sqeeze now and i want to move to wheezy.I have googled it and
>> find so many answers,but i  have installed some non free softwares in my
>> SQUEEZE . I think that it may give problems at time of upgrade.I am pasting
>> sources.list
>>
>>> deb-src http://security.debian.org/ squeeze/updates main
>>> deb http://security.debian.org/ squeeze/updates main contrib non-free
>>> deb http://mozilla.debian.net/ squeeze-backports iceweasel-release
>>>
>>> #backports
>>> deb http://backports.debian.org/debian-backports squeeze-backports main
>>> deb http://backports.debian.org/debian-backports squeeze-backports main
>>> contrib non-free
>>>
>>> #mirror
>>> deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian squeeze main contrib non-free
>>>
>>> #multimedia
>>> deb ftp://ftp.deb-multimedia.org squeeze main non-free
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> can any one please brief the upgrade process?
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> Archive: [🔎] CALL-Q8yscmbBH=aXizxpQXQ0GoSXSjOref4N3+BdoMRto6osBA@mail.gmail.com">http://lists.debian.org/[🔎] CALL-Q8yscmbBH=aXizxpQXQ0GoSXSjOref4N3+BdoMRto6osBA@mail.gmail.com
>


Reply to: