Re: Copyright problems for the opensource reimplementation of a closed-source library (ITP #679504)
Roger Leigh <rleigh@codelibre.net> writes:
> To avoid any implication that anything from the headers has been copied,
> why not just use the output of "nm [-D]". This is the interface that
> programs use to link with the library, and is what you need to provide
> as a drop-in replacement.
I'm also not a lawyer, and you'd really need to get a legal opinion, but
I'm fairly sure that this is excessively conservative. The prototypes in
the header (sans any macros, inline functions, or comments) constitute a
functional interface, which is not copyrightable in the US and I believe
is not copyrightable in Europe either. There is some precendent for doing
something similar to what you're doing (see readline/editline).
Of course, even if what you're doing is perfectly legal, that doesn't
prevent someone from suing you anyway.
--
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Reply to: