> I'm slightly surprised by these package-contains-broken-symlink lintian > warnings, as the package seems to have correct depends, so I've asked the > lintian maintainers about it. Please keep an eye on these warnings and > probably remove the overrides one day :) This is probably related to bug 672297 (although then the description should be updated if it is). By the way, I believe that lintian asks not to override lintian warnings if lintian needs to be fixed instead. I.e. if lintian produces a warning that is a false positive and should be fixed in lintian, you should not provide a lintian override. This is in contrast to false positives that are difficult or impossible to fix in lintian, e.g. because your case is a corner case. Paul
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature