[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#676516: marked as done (RFS: prelink/0.0.20090925-2 [QA])

Your message dated Sat, 9 Jun 2012 05:44:16 +0000
with message-id <20120609054416.GB795@master.debian.org>
and subject line RFS: prelink/0.0.20090925-2 [QA]
has caused the Debian Bug report #676516,
regarding RFS: prelink/0.0.20090925-2 [QA]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
676516: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=676516
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal


Hello.

I request a fast QA upload of the prelink package with several patches
from the upstream VCS that fix the wine build. I want to have wine built
with this version (more precisely, with the version that produces proper
binaries, if this upload doesn't fix everything) in wheezy.

The package is available at
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/prelink/prelink_0.0.20090925-2.dsc

http://bugs.debian.org/676390 tracks the problem with the current sid
version of the prelink package. http://bugs.debian.org/676246 tracks the
problem with wine caused by the problem with prelink. Both these bugs are
in Cc:.

$ debdiff prelink_0.0.20090925-1.dsc prelink_0.0.20090925-2.dsc |diffstat
 debian/patches/r187.dpatch                 |  124 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 debian/patches/r188.dpatch                 |  104 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 debian/patches/r189.dpatch                 |   57 +++++++++++++
 debian/patches/r190.dpatch                 |   32 +++++++
 prelink-0.0.20090925/debian/changelog      |   11 ++
 prelink-0.0.20090925/debian/control        |    3 
 prelink-0.0.20090925/debian/patches/00list |    4 
 7 files changed, 333 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

$ diffstat prelink-0.0.20090925/debian/patches/r187.dpatch prelink-0.0.20090925/debian/patches/r188.dpatch prelink-0.0.20090925/debian/patches/r189.dpatch prelink-0.0.20090925/debian/patches/r190.dpatch 
 dwarf2.c |   76 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 dwarf2.h |   31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

The changelog entry:

  * QA upload
  * debian/control: Set Maintainer: to the QA group, drop Uploaders:
  * debian/patches/: Add r187.dpatch, r188.dpatch, r189.dpatch and
    r190.dpatch, cherry-picked from the upstream SVN
    (svn://sourceware.org/svn/prelink), which define and handle several new
    DWARF codes emitted by gcc > 4.5 (Closes: #676390)


I am aware of ITA #657967 and of work that is done by Daniel but I'm
afraid that it can miss wheezy while fixing wine actually requires only
relatively small changes to two files.

-- 
WBR, wRAR

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
This version of prelink is in unstable now:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/p/prelink/news/20120608T170415Z.html

Regards,

Bart Martens

--- End Message ---
Reply to: