[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#670334: Sponsoring of notion, a first look



Hi Axel,

thank you very much for your comments.

> a few observations (without having gone too deep yet, so I might have overseen
> some reasoning):
> 
> notion_3+2012042300.orig.tar.gz from your package and
> notion-3-2012042300-src.tar.gz from SF seem to differ:
> 
> 0ffd57a75f2c1a75ce551b3baef1fee0  notion_3+2012042300.orig.tar.gz
> 96d004374e92e3188608a39afea2d75f  notion-3-2012042300-src.tar.gz
> 
> -rw-r--r--  1 abe tar 754121 May 16 15:29 notion_3+2012042300.orig.tar.gz
> -rw-r--r--  1 abe tar 762655 Apr 23 18:42 notion-3-2012042300-src.tar.gz
> 
> Is this on purpose?

The files in the two archives are the same according to a recursive md5sum, 
only the parent directories are called differently (we use 3-... as an 
upstream version, which we change to 3+... when importing into the Debian git 
repository to comply with [1]) and some file status information differs 
(maybe/probably for the same reason).

> The upstream ChangeLog says "(The ChangeLog will be generated by
> release scripts from svn logs)" -- looks like packaging a VCS
> snapshot. But the version suggests that an official upstream release
> and not a snapshot is packaged. Also such a ChangeLog stub should IMHO
> not show up in the Debian package as it's useless.

Arnout has dropped the changelog, thanks.

> Even if mentors.d.n hasn't found relevant lintian warnings, the new
> lintian does. :-)
> 
> [hardening flags]

We have enabled hardening flags through a Debian patch to the build system. A 
few Lintian warnings remain, but according to a discussion in #debian-mentors, 
these are false positives.

Regards,
Philipp


[1] http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/first.en.html#namever



Reply to: