Re: Bug#669373: RFS: flactag/2.0.1-1 ITP #507876

To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#669373: RFS: flactag/2.0.1-1 ITP #507876
From: Andy Hawkins <andy@gently.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 21:42:31 +0000 (UTC)
Message-id: <[🔎] slrnjrldm7.7ih.andy@atom.gently.org.uk>
References: <4FB7D397.2020405@pocock.com.au> <20120519181536.GA23422@master.debian.org> <20120520105816.GA17137@gently.org.uk> <20120520110837.GA30290@master.debian.org> <20120520183346.GA1178@gently.org.uk> <20120520185333.GB26739@master.debian.org> <20120520185659.GA2321@gently.org.uk> <20120520191446.GA13760@master.debian.org> <4FB94E57.3080807@pocock.com.au> <[🔎] 4FBA96F3.1080405@pocock.com.au> <[🔎] 20120521193534.GA2732@gently.org.uk> <[🔎] 4FBAB097.7080302@trendhosting.net>

Hi,

In article <[🔎] 4FBAB097.7080302@trendhosting.net>,
> I wonder if that is justification to make a lintian-override for that
> warning?

If someone else can confirm that's the cause, then yes.

Andy

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bug#669373: RFS: flactag/2.0.1-1 ITP #507876
  - From: Daniel Pocock <daniel@trendhosting.net>

References:
- Re: Bug#669373: RFS: flactag/2.0.1-1 ITP #507876
  - From: Daniel Pocock <daniel@pocock.com.au>
- Re: Bug#669373: RFS: flactag/2.0.1-1 ITP #507876
  - From: Andy Hawkins <andy@gently.org.uk>
- Re: Bug#669373: RFS: flactag/2.0.1-1 ITP #507876
  - From: Daniel Pocock <daniel@trendhosting.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Bug#669373: RFS: flactag/2.0.1-1 ITP #507876
Next by Date: Re: Bug#669373: RFS: flactag/2.0.1-1 ITP #507876
Previous by thread: Re: Bug#669373: RFS: flactag/2.0.1-1 ITP #507876
Next by thread: Re: Bug#669373: RFS: flactag/2.0.1-1 ITP #507876
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread