Hello, On Mon, 14 May 2012 07:44:02 -0400 Paul Tagliamonte <tag@pault.ag> wrote: > > > * Please use dpkg-statoverride rather then that rules override > > > you've got in there, since you can have some problems on upgrade, > > > etc. > > How it that going to help? It's build-time thing, it doesn't > > matter, I guess. > It was late, you're right. Well, you're wrong, but you're right. The > *real* reason not to use this is because it's really more for > end-users and sysadmins, like dpkg-divert. It'd add a dpkg entry that > the package shouldn't be shipping, and chmod is right. My bad. Sorry, from your message I can't see where I'm wrong. "build-time thing" was about chmod. Unlike dpkg-whatever. > > > * You should also consider using DEP5 for your copyright. > > May be or may not be needed. It's optional at this moment, so I > > don't use it widely (yet). > It's in the packaging manual, and it's been accepted. You should be > taking it more seriously. It's perhaps not a requirement, but it's a > good thing to have. It's been accepted but it wasn't promoted to thing which is required. I see no real reason to use it yet, at least here, sorry. -- WBR, Andrew
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature