Re: Packaging where upstream only has a git repo

[Michael van der Kolff <mvanderkolff@gmail.com>]

Never mind, I found a real upstream.  Turned out the author moved
development from github, but left no pointer :(

Warmest regards,

Michael

On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Michael van der Kolff
<mvanderkolff@gmail.com> wrote:
> Are there any best practices when packaging where upstream only has a
> git repo?  I was thinking of forking it and tagging it, and so on;
> does that make sense as a means of "maintaining" an upstream?
>
> I wish to package gedit-code-assistance, found at
> https://github.com/jonocodes/gedit-code-assistance.  It works with the
> gedit and libclang-dev presently in sid; I haven't tested it against
> the libclang living in experimental.
>
> Warmest regards,
>
> Michael