[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#667092: RFS: tcng/10b-4 [RC, QA]



On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 12:55:32PM -0400, David Prévot wrote:
> Le 04/04/2012 06:38, Adam Borowski a écrit :
> 
> > Should I be rather Lintian correct, or what-seems-to-be-right correct?
> 
> Reading the long description usually helps:
> 
> > $ lintian-info --tags changelog-should-mention-qa
> > W: changelog-should-mention-qa
> > N:
> > N:   If this upload is to orphan this package, please mention this fact on
> > N:   the first line of the changelog. If this is a QA upload, please
> > N:   mention "QA (group) upload" there.

Beh, so the order of changelog lines matters?  I've read this description
but never suspected this is actually the case.

Fixed.


-- 
// If you believe in so-called "intellectual property", please immediately
// cease using counterfeit alphabets.  Instead, contact the nearest temple
// of Amon, whose priests will provide you with scribal services for all
// your writing needs, for Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory prices.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: