Re: RFS: libconfig (requires transition)
- To: jcristau@debian.org
- Cc: kibi@debian.org, debian-mentors@lists.debian.org, debian-release@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: RFS: libconfig (requires transition)
- From: Jonathan McCrohan <jmccrohan@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 02:34:51 +0000
- Message-id: <[🔎] 4F4EE04B.3060300@gmail.com>
- In-reply-to: <4F3808BC.3090509@gmail.com>
- References: <20120126221815.GL31641@mraw.org> <4F21F7C1.6040600@gmail.com> <20120127072054.GQ4901@radis.cristau.org> <d34e115e-4eda-42e9-beaf-334bdcf16123@email.android.com> <20120127192341.GR4901@radis.cristau.org> <4F240D87.3050502@gmail.com> <20120130191500.GC19118@radis.cristau.org> <4F2722E1.3030409@gmail.com> <20120203230206.GW19118@radis.cristau.org> <4F36BF9E.2050700@gmail.com> <20120212134435.GK16069@radis.cristau.org> <4F3808BC.3090509@gmail.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 12/02/12 18:45, Jonathan McCrohan wrote:
> I've fixed these and reuploaded 1.4.8-1 to mentors now.
libconfig 1.4.8-1~exp1 is currently in experimental and I have now
uploaded libconfig 1.4.8-2 to mentors.d.n.
libconfig (1.4.8-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Upload to unstable
* Update to S-V 3.9.3
* debian/rules now uses dpkg-buildflags
* Provide full transitional packages to help -dev package rename
* Multiple lintian fixes
- out-of-date-standards-version
- copyright-with-old-dh-make-debian-copyright
- extended-description-is-probably-too-short
- unneeded-build-dep-on-quilt
-- Jonathan McCrohan <jmccrohan@gmail.com> Thu, 01 Mar 2012 02:11:47
+0000
The following packages rebuild correctly and just need a binNMU:
* flush
* libffado
* libguestfs
* lldpad
* meterec
* qwo
* yubiserver
The following packages require a sourceful upload:
* sitplus (#661403)
The following packages are RC buggy and not in testing:
* ldc
A number of packages still have the old libconfig(++)8-dev package in
their B-D. I have filed bug reports against these packages, but I
guess these are not critical given that there is a transition package
being provided too.
As far as I can see, sitplus is the only package involved in other
transitions. Once the opencv transition is over, am I ok so look for a
sponsor to review and upload my package to unstable?
Thanks,
Jon
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPTuBLAAoJEJ6XA7Whh53b8ikH/AoIsPTbpzJECDpCmY27ACG4
XMZkbsKu790+p2zZ1wBrWZpGdD3vdjiG+OeQ+BZcdlD857VPJSWhw6z/KqGZ/WEH
2Hw1qnPatDPvSuSSJUvqFSv2vdy+SUHlY6UkXMdp1EYMWKmxqf4NWuycTGIfxDaF
TaMctGmGMKqrY5B4nJBF4Rba9xe+WzdS+3jCt0DAU4wRI+K/8Mrl6R2Uo3pV/Sv4
yoi/qcYccpFqv7OSd36wOOB8hqVG/1kaSGjK3Yl3Kx5IIb2bsoSUQOALLZ0aa128
p/RVhDyFP2Rl01+gDen3qlvVEyZqwbN+UmYdTELHpXDemNcJAMpcMSLlcRCkWX0=
=LuXU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: