Re: sponsorship-requests

To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: sponsorship-requests
From: Savvas Radevic <vicedar@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 10:44:44 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] CAP1y3Pdz89r+Pquad3woYtW+AwfLqevP2Uznh6bwNRcja5QWpA@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20120202170457.GA6986@jwilk.net>
References: <4F26EA94.8090107@rezozer.net> <CAO6P2QTDTCJJvg0-LRn6JAHCGLGWKF_c1RTW5CtY-gjgPBR2cg@mail.gmail.com> <169541327952491@web122.yandex.ru> <CAP1y3PdzZSe6KH0zjA=dK1H002up6h-Vy6z8CgBjb4EPVnW41w@mail.gmail.com> <186361327955418@web122.yandex.ru> <CAL6k_Az41-G0-AbUKEBTfoRiQuOoaaHbHOKHLLxV4=DQWiPm6w@mail.gmail.com> <132091327957289@web98.yandex.ru> <20120130214402.GA8318@jwilk.net> <[🔎] 20120202170457.GA6986@jwilk.net>

Looking at http://wiki.debian.org/Mentors/BTS I see we need to "tag" the new packages with [NEW]. I've seen some bugs with [ITP], so which one should we use, [NEW] or [ITP]?

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: sponsorship-requests
  - From: Nicolas Dandrimont <nicolas.dandrimont@crans.org>

References:
- Re: sponsorship-requests
  - From: Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Which git tool should I use?
Next by Date: Processed: retitle 658032 to RFS: libgxps/0.2.1-1 [NEW] -- library for handling and rendering XPS documents
Previous by thread: Re: sponsorship-requests
Next by thread: Re: sponsorship-requests
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread