[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: libapache2-mod-rpaf

>>>  For example, that was not "a very first upload" (of mod_rpaf) for me.
>>>  But next time I should convince new sponsor and so on.
>>  That's unfortunate, but this happens. I'm sorry for you, and I made
>>  similar experiences.
> It's just too common to be "the default route".
>>  I know what you mean. I am a Debian Maintainer by myself and I'm in the
>>  same situation as you are. Several Debian developers are perhaps quite
>>  annoyed by me as well, as I was complaining a lot about the sponsor
>>  situation in Debian in the past.
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/05/msg00753.html
> This one?

Hmm, it was very interesting thread [1]. Thank you for a link.

Best regards,

[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/05/thrd2.html#00753

Reply to: