Re: NMU done but unresponsive maintainer

[Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org>]

* Alexander Reichle-Schmehl <tolimar@debian.org>, 2011-12-09, 13:56:
> > > * Only fixing a wishlist bug, nothing else
> > > * The wishlisht bug is a "new version" not detailing why the new 
> > > version is needed
> > > * No apparent consent of the maintainer for the NMU
> > I agree with the first two points. But I think the third is OK, 
> > according to Emilien's previous message, the maintainer did bless the 
> > NMU.
>
> Ah, right.  Missed that.  However, his mail seems to underline my 
> point: This package should have at least a new co-maintainer,

Eh, why? Because the maintainer failed to respond to a wishlist bug?

--
Jakub Wilk