Re: Tracking RFSs as bugs

To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Tracking RFSs as bugs
From: Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 23:03:27 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20110908210327.GA1470@jwilk.net>
Mail-followup-to: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20110908235446.3af4290d@ileemo>
References: <[🔎] 20110905151209.05edc47147b9d5355c42c81b@gmail.com> <[🔎] 20110908235446.3af4290d@ileemo>

* Andrew O. Shadura <bugzilla@tut.by>, 2011-09-08, 23:54:

We already have ITP bugs. Why not just retitle them into RFS whensomeone wants their package to be sponsored?


Not all sponsored packages are new. I'd hope most of them are not!

--
Jakub Wilk

Reply to:

References:
- Tracking RFSs as bugs
  - From: Michael Gilbert <michael.s.gilbert@gmail.com>
- Re: Tracking RFSs as bugs
  - From: "Andrew O. Shadura" <bugzilla@tut.by>

Prev by Date: Re: Tracking RFSs as bugs
Next by Date: Re: Tracking RFSs as bugs
Previous by thread: Re: Tracking RFSs as bugs
Next by thread: Re: Tracking RFSs as bugs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread