Hi Jakub, On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 20:48 +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Kilian Krause <kilian@debian.org>, 2011-07-14, 20:34: > >If you can confirm that the symbols file for your last version and this > >version match up perfectly, then the SONAME shouldn't have been bumped > >in the first place > > Err, no, you can't conclude that ABI wasn't broken just from the fact > that symbol lists didn't change. Err, of course you're right. I just had the logic inverted and of course if the symbols don't match the ABI is broken - not the opposite. Yet my comment still stands that just putting a new SONAME disregarding of ABI changes is not neccessarily a good thing IMHO. -- Best regards, Kilian
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part