[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: how to get people to run lintian on their packages



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Karl,

On 08.07.2011 05:49, Karl Goetz wrote:
>>   - The -I and --pedantic options should always be used.
> 
> Why is that? the manual entry for --pedantic says
>>               Pedantic tags are Lintian at its most pickiest and
>> include checks for particular Debian packaging styles and checks that
>>               many people disagree with.  Expect false positives and
>> Lintian tags that you don't consider useful if you use this option.
>>               Adding overrides for pedantic tags is probably not
>> worth the effort.
> Wouldn't requiring people show tags that aren't relevant just train
> them to ignore lintian?

its not, pedantic Lintian warnings weren't useful or /only/ false
positives. There is just a slightly higher degree to encounter false
positive or "screw you Niel^W^WLintian I don't care at all" tags.

That said, some pedantic tags can probably be ignored but most are
nonetheless still a very helpful addition one better should consider
when packaging software.

- -- 
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=kZWS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: