[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: x52pro



Hi,

> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 10:02:02PM +0200, Fabrizio Regalli wrote:
> > I'm not a DD so, as usal, you can ignore my note.
> > Checking your package I see only it use an out-of-date Standards-Version
> > If you can, try to update it to newest version (3.9.2) and check if
> > everything still works
> > 
> Uploaded with Standards-Version: 3.9.2.
> 

Uploaded to the archives, pending acceptance by ftp-masters. As I understand,
not having copyright information in source files is ok - but it's not good
practice. Could you please persuade upstream to make sure the include copyright
and license information in each of their source and header files for the next
upstream release?

Best regards,
Michael

Attachment: pgpHwVK9kAtE2.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: