Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package for experimental)
Tony Houghton <h@realh.co.uk> writes:
> On 09/01/11 14:45, Kan-Ru Chen wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Tony Houghton<h@realh.co.uk> writes:
>>
>>> I RFSd 1.20.1-1 about a week ago but it was overlooked and I received
>>> a patch this weekend so instead of pinging my previous RFS I created a
>>> new version and merged the debian/changelog entries for 1.20.1-1 through
>>> 1.20.3-1 as the earlier 1.20.* versions were not released. The latest
>>> version is to ensure that the package doesn't require po4a to build from
>>> a release tarball.
>>
>> I was checking this package. I found that the changelog entries seem
>> messed up, in a way that old entries and new entries are mixed together.
>>
>> Please tidy up the changelogs then I will upload it.
>
> Do you mean the Debian changelog or upstream? I can't see a problem with
> either, please could you show an example of where entries have been
> mixed up.
The Debian changelog.
I downloaded the package from mentors.d.o, the most recent 6 changelog
entries are:
roxterm (1.20.3-1) experimental; urgency=low
roxterm (1.19.4-1) unstable; urgency=low
roxterm (1.19.3-1) unstable; urgency=low
roxterm (1.19.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
*roxterm (1.18.5-3) unstable; urgency=low
roxterm (1.19.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
Apparently only the 1.18.5-3 is currently in sid. Debdiff also
indicates the other entries are newly introduced.
Cheers,
Kanru
--
A badly written book is only a blunder. A bad translation of a good
book is a crime.
-- Gilbert Highet
Reply to: