[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: policyd-weight



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Werner,

On 25.12.2011 15:29, werner@aloah-from-hell.de wrote:
> So - I'm still interested in working for the policyd weight package but currently
> I do not know where to start properly. My idea to repackage the current stable one
> wasn't that smart, apperently :)
> 
> In the long run, I want to take over the package as there is currently no maintainer
> for it. As you said, I should check the current package in testing if the mentioned
> bug there does also persist ?
> 

we're developing towards Unstable only. Thus, if you want to take over
as a maintainer of a package your work is always invested in Unstable.

In your case the package is orphaned, hence you can just take over it.
Use the latest source package available in Debian Unstable, package the
new upstream version and start working on open bugs. Don't forget to
replace yourself as maintainer in debian/control as you become
responsible for the package. If there is a version control system for
the package somewhere you might want to check latest bits available
there as well.

Once your work is done present the reworked source package here again,
and people will review and upload it successively.

- -- 
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=xE44
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: