RFS: flashcache
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "flashcache".
* Package name : flashcache
Version : 1.0+git201109221219-1
Upstream Author : Mohan Srinivasan et. al. (for Facebook)
* URL : https://github.com/facebook/flashcache
* License : GPL-2 / BSD-2-clause
Section : kernel
It builds those binary packages:
flashcache-dkms - write-back block device cache for Linux (DKMS version)
flashcache-utils - write-back block device cache for Linux (user space
utilities)
To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/flashcache
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/flashcache/flashcache_1.0+git201109221219-1.dsc
Note: The package builds a source only DKMS kernel module which is
installed at the installation site, and binary utils. It's not very easy
to find documentation on DKMS kernel module packages. If any of you have
more experience with them than I do, please let me know about problems
with it.
Moreover the DKMS package is arch: all but /really/ should be arch:
linux-all if we only would support that. It was tested with both, kernel
3.0 and 3.1.
The Lintian warnings about hyphens used as minus sign are legit but
appear to be a problem in the tool creating them.
I am Debian Maintainer (DM). Upon your choice as sponsor, you eventually
can get get rid of me annoying you with sponsoring requests by letting
me set DMUA anytime in future.
This package is team maintained. I got a lot of help by Dmitry in the
past. Some of you might remember of having already heard of the package
in the past on this list. :)
- --
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=j353
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: