Re: [RFH] for gnatpython
* xavier grave <firstname.lastname@example.org>, 2011-09-26, 23:41:
I have started to package it  or , reading . But I'm not a
Python developer. So I'd like to know if somebody from the Debian
Python Team can review my work and when the package reach Debian Python
Policy standards upload it ?
It'd easier for us if you if you built source package and uploaded it
somewhere, e.g. to mentors.debian.net. I doubt many people here are
familiar with monotone... But anyway, while I probably won't be able to
sponsor it, here's my very quick and incomplete review:
You get-orig-source is crazy. You can't create (and then remove!)
stuff outside the package directory just like that!
rm -f `find . -name '*.py[co]'`
could be written as
find . -name '*.py[co]' -delete
which is more readable (IMO).
The dance you do in the install-stamp target looks very, and I believe
that it now (since 2.7 is the default version) makes your package fails
to build. Just pass --install-layout=deb to setup.py, and it'll install
stuff in the right places.
You use python-support, but you don't depend on it. (BTW, lintian would
tell you that...)
Build-dependency on python-dev is also missing. (BTW, you would easily
notice it if you built your package in a minimal environment.)
As per Python Policy 2.2, the package name should be python-gnatpython.
Binaries in /usr/bin/ are very generic. Please consider renaming them.
It's recommended to build extension modules for all supported Python
versions, not only for the default one.
The size of -doc package is only 4KB. Why it has to be separate?
 --install-layout=deb works since squeeze. If you are interested in
producing a package easily backportable to other distribution, there are
tricks to do it, just ask. :)