Re: RFS: getstream

[Christoph Egger <christoph@debian.org>]

Hi!

Hervé Rousseau <herve@moulticast.net> writes:
> On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 14:17, Christoph Egger <christoph@debian.org> wrote:
>> The orig.tar.gz downloaded from the website differs from the orig.tar.gz
>> in your package:
>>
>> 1144dc0180cedb494f6c7826e994fc3bcf7eebe4 getstream_20100616.orig.tar.gz.website
>> 1e45acb2b75b6da9ecd446408f04dd2631c5f71f getstream_20100616.orig.tar.gz.mentors
>>
>> Is there any reason for that?
>
> Hi !
>
> I guess I unpacked the archive and did some changes I forgot to
> reverse and start again from the original .tgz...
> I have re-uploaded the package on mentors.debian.net with the proper
> original archive from upstream's website.

  I'm mostly fine with uploading. However I'm wondering about the
licensing. I couldn't find any information about a license apart from a
single file that claims to be taken from the kernel and being GPLv2 (not
GPLv2 or later like in debian/copyright though that doesn't matter
probably as it was Public Domain before). Is there any claim hidden
somwhere that the rest of getstream is GPLv2?

Regards

    Christoph

-- 
9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857  70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731
Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer