Re: RFS: getstream
Hervé Rousseau <email@example.com> writes:
> On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 14:17, Christoph Egger <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> The orig.tar.gz downloaded from the website differs from the orig.tar.gz
>> in your package:
>> 1144dc0180cedb494f6c7826e994fc3bcf7eebe4 getstream_20100616.orig.tar.gz.website
>> 1e45acb2b75b6da9ecd446408f04dd2631c5f71f getstream_20100616.orig.tar.gz.mentors
>> Is there any reason for that?
> Hi !
> I guess I unpacked the archive and did some changes I forgot to
> reverse and start again from the original .tgz...
> I have re-uploaded the package on mentors.debian.net with the proper
> original archive from upstream's website.
I'm mostly fine with uploading. However I'm wondering about the
licensing. I couldn't find any information about a license apart from a
single file that claims to be taken from the kernel and being GPLv2 (not
GPLv2 or later like in debian/copyright though that doesn't matter
probably as it was Public Domain before). Is there any claim hidden
somwhere that the rest of getstream is GPLv2?
9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731
Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer