Re: RFS: presage
- To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: RFS: presage
- From: Matteo Vescovi <matteo.vescovi@yahoo.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2011 21:13:06 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 4E3C4ED2.9040607@yahoo.co.uk>
- In-reply-to: <AANLkTinfm-QPEm2XPyS4doedvrpERAkMCnsCRyuMoKUY@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <20100603215148.GB19324@burrow> <AANLkTilElxVP9G_po9xPNPFvwFl22zp7e1p-_RFhJ8QM@mail.gmail.com> <4C14A79B.8060003@yahoo.co.uk> <AANLkTinwH-UNyKNCfJjmVajWzbLhfKVZKqleLiQIvRFg@mail.gmail.com> <4C1BEDFC.7010606@yahoo.co.uk> <AANLkTimMh4FmSock4w1jt9Kq2uUS0OaLi513wJeuuCmo@mail.gmail.com> <4C2125FC.5050201@yahoo.co.uk> <AANLkTimZI5ij6DuIkMZo1ysJ802WDT2TolGPE3N4mTg9@mail.gmail.com> <4C2A3981.9000300@yahoo.co.uk> <AANLkTimdZpMFnkfQhe3WHbQxPY_eibp9j8GVmnONL4Se@mail.gmail.com> <4C38BCA4.8080409@yahoo.co.uk> <AANLkTilOms5_zbc4sG0aBStpRmOq11HqWW0p_Bmcb5Ib@mail.gmail.com> <4C3F469F.4090304@yahoo.co.uk> <AANLkTimx3AherL84f65S4U5m76TUJUnNVwUJ8hsJhTk8@mail.gmail.com> <4C66802B.9000702@yahoo.co.uk> <AANLkTinfm-QPEm2XPyS4doedvrpERAkMCnsCRyuMoKUY@mail.gmail.com>
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor/reviewer for my package "presage".
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/presage
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable
main contrib non-free
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/presage/presage_0.8.6-1.dsc
Since the last review, I switched the packaging from CDBS to debhelper 7 dh.
The package appears to be lintian clean (running sid's `lintian -iIE
--pedantic' on the .changes file), except for a bunch of experimental
duplicate-files warnings such as:
X: libpresage-doc: duplicate-files
usr/share/doc/libpresage-doc/html/classVariable_a178047db72953639e28c5931afca5f71_cgraph.md5
usr/share/doc/libpresage-doc/html/classVariable_a90a6a790b6f307e872919d8f4e9c809b_cgraph.md5
N:
N: The package ships the two (or more) files with the exact same
contents.
N:
N: Severity: minor, Certainty: possible
N:
N: Check: duplicate-files, Type: binary
N:
N: This tag is marked experimental, which means that the code that
N: generates it is not as well-tested as the rest of Lintian and might
N: still give surprising results. Feel free to ignore experimental tags
N: that do not seem to make sense, though of course bug reports are
always
N: welcomed.
N:
These warnings apply to files generated by Doxygen during the build.
Should I add lintian overrides for these?
I would be glad if someone reviewed/uploaded this package for me.
Thank you for your time,
- Matteo Vescovi
Reply to: