Paul, On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 10:47:24PM +0200, Paul Wise wrote: > It is rare to see an RFS that says "The package appears to be lintian > clean." and the package (especially binary ones) actually be lintian > clean. If we were to change the RFS template, what could we change it > to in order to encourage accuracy and for people to actually use > lintian and fix any issues found. I guess it'd help to make that line read: lintian -F gave: [...] lintian --pedantic -I reports however: [...] Or something alike. Apart from that I still hope the new mentors.d.n (for full list of good ideas see [1]) will come alive and allow us to make automatic checks possible. Until that happens though I've put together a somewhat lenghty test-script that I usually run on my resulting packages after they are built as a review process. And if that fails, I'll report it back to the list like anyone else. Would be greath though if we could improve that situation. Does anyone know the current status of the new mentors.d.n? [1]: http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMentorsNet -- Best regards, Kilian
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature