Hello, On Mon, 30 May 2011 17:39:40 +0800 Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> wrote: > > It's much harder to read it for humans than old good traditional > > debian/copyright. > Which format are you talking about? The "old good traditional > format" is in fact no format at all, with no rules, and we had > all sorts of formatting, which is why DEP5 was invented. Why not just make it a format, e.g. require that some things must presents here, some another must be there, but leave it relatively free-form? Personally I like using something like traditional d/c plus some DEP5 fields if necessary. For me, strict DEP5 is extremely hard to read unlike what was before it was invented. -- WBR, Andrew
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature