Re: RFS: gtkpod (updated package)
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 11:17:38AM +0200, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote:
> > - debian/rules :
> > - why do you remove RPATHs from executables and binary ? It's stated briefly
> > in NEWS.debian, but the reason is not there.
> Without this hack, it doesn't compile and build. I'll add a line about
> it in NEWS.Debian (or README.Debian?).
Eventually README.Debian as it does not concern end-users.
> > - as libgtkpod.la is new, no reverse dependencies should depend on its
> > existence. It should be safe not to install it.
> OK, gonna remove it. However I asked in IRC channel and they told me how
> to blank the dependency_libs field and keep the rest of the file, for
Actually there is no need to be compatible as nothing depends on it
> > - the "README.debian" is not necessary.
> Really? OK.
I mean the line in debian/changelog : it adds nothing because relevant
information is already in README.debian.