[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

RFS: rush (new package)

Dear mentors,

if a repackaging in order to circumvent GFDL-1.3 is not
enough for you to proceed, then nothing will ever satisfy
your desires. Still, I send a further reminder.

måndag den 18 april 2011 klockan 16:16 skrev Mats Erik Andersson detta:
> Dear mentors,
> I am looking for a sponsor of the package "rush".
> The upstream source had to be repackaged due to
> an issue with GFDL-1.3. The Texinfo source has
> been removed in order to get the software itself
> into "main", but I had compiled manual pages already.
>   Package name:      rush
>   Version:           1.7+dfsg-1
>   Upstream author:   Sergey Poznyakoff <gray@gnu.org.ua>
>   URL:               http://puszcza.gnu.org.ua/projects/rush/
>   License:           GPL-3
>   Section:           shells
> It builds a single binary package:
> gnurush    - restricted user shell
> The package is pedantically lintian clean.
> The upload would fix the RFP/ITP bug: 515198
> Motivation for maintaining this package:
>   The package has been requested and I take interest in
>   arrangements providing minimal access for selected users,
>   like select backup services or repository manipulations
>   in an otherwise locked down system. The initial packaging
>   applicant waived at the effort needed.
> The present packaging has received a supplementary helper service.
> It and its documentation has been fully tested on GNU/Linux as
> well as GNU/kFreeBSD, and the differences are described. Thus a
> quick creation of chrooted services with either of sctp, sftp,
> rsync, git, svn, or cvs are thoroughly described.
> The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
> - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/rush
> - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main
> - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/rush/rush_1.7+dfsg-1.dsc
> Having seen this package getting rejected twice,
> for not being able to spot the licensing issue,
> I would interest me to go through the procedure
> once more, hopefully avoiding a further reject!

  Mats Erik Andersson, DM

Reply to: