[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: poedit (updated package)



Hi,

On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 11:35:09PM +0000, Pedro Ribeiro wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.4.6.1-3
> of my package "poedit".
> 
> It builds these binary packages:
> poedit     - gettext catalog editor
> poedit-dbg - gettext catalog editor (debug)
> 
> The package appears to be lintian clean.
> 
> The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
> - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/poedit
> - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable
> main contrib non-free
> - dget
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/poedit/poedit_1.4.6.1-3.dsc
> 
> I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Some remarks:

- There should be no debian-changes-1.4.6.1-3, but smaller patches for changes
  specific to Debian.
  debian/patches/01-desktop.patch         |   22
  debian/patches/debian-changes-1.4.6.1-3 |88638 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  debian/patches/series                   |    1

- +++ poedit-1.4.6.1/debian/patches/debian-changes-1.4.6.1-3      2011-01-04 01:44:08.000000000 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,88638 @@
+Description: Upstream changes introduced in version 1.4.6.1-3

Upstream changes are supposed to be present in the upstream tarball
poedit_1.4.6.1.orig.tar.gz

- If you adopt the package, you shoud discuss on #543856 as some other people
  proposed to adopt poedit 
- Once discussion is over, follow carefully how to close oprhaning request at
  http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/#howto-o (it includes closing the bug in the
  Debian changelog)
- IMO, the debian/changelog should only contains entries that have been
  uploaded, so you probably want to discard entries specific to 1.4.6.1-2 and
  1.4.6.1-1, something like:

poedit (1.4.6.1-3) unstable; urgency=low

  * Lintian clean
  * New upstream version (Closes: #556620, #607749).
  * Adopt package (Closes: #543859). <-- not the right bug number/package
  * Some minor corrections of this file.

 -- Pedro Ribeiro <p.m42.ribeiro@gmail.com>  Thu, 27 Dec 2010 22:27:00 +0100


-- 
Simon Paillard


Reply to: