RFS: git
Hi mentors,
Another week, another -rc (1:1.7.4~rc2-0.1). I sent an RFS for -rc0
two weeks ago; this is just a followup. The target distribution of
this proposed NMU is experimental.
It builds these binary packages:
git - fast, scalable, distributed revision control system
git-all - fast, scalable, distributed revision control system (all subpacka
git-arch - fast, scalable, distributed revision control system (arch interop
git-core - fast, scalable, distributed revision control system (obsolete)
git-cvs - fast, scalable, distributed revision control system (cvs interope
git-daemon-run - fast, scalable, distributed revision control system (git-daemon s
git-doc - fast, scalable, distributed revision control system (documentatio
git-email - fast, scalable, distributed revision control system (email add-on
git-gui - fast, scalable, distributed revision control system (GUI)
git-man - fast, scalable, distributed revision control system (manual pages
git-svn - fast, scalable, distributed revision control system (svn interope
gitk - fast, scalable, distributed revision control system (revision tre
gitweb - fast, scalable, distributed revision control system (web interfac
The upload would fix these bugs: 465776, 466471, 499002, 507476, 524309,
540001, 576887, 577471, 578752, 581691, 583699, 585725, 588103, 598245, 600566,
600785, 606975, 607044.
Aside from the new upstream version --- which is the motivation --- this
brings some cleanups suggested by lintian and adds a new architecture-
independent git-man package so the documentation processing toolchain
does not have to run on autobuilders (nor on private machines when
testing with "debian/rules binary-arch BUILD_DOCS=").
Gerrit is on vacation (see debian-private). With your help the new
upstream version could get some testing from users of experimental
before it releases.
The package can be found in the usual places:
- git://repo.or.cz/debian-git/jrn.git proposed-updates
- dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/git/git_1.7.4~rc2-0.1.dsc
I would be glad for any thoughts you have.
Regards,
Jonathan
Reply to:
- References:
- RFS: git
- From: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>