[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: c2html (updated package)



El jue, 06-01-2011 a las 12:50 +0100, Niels Thykier escribió:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
> 
> On 2011-01-06 03:30, fulapol hl wrote:
> > Dear mentors,
> > 
> > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.9.6-4
> > of my package "c2html".
> > 
> > It builds these binary packages:
> > c2html - Highlight C sources for WWW presentation
> > 
> > The upload would fix these bugs: 595541
> > 
> 
> Yes and no... the package would technically still be orphaned as you
> have not updated the Maintainer field in d/control. Also I personally
> think it is overkill to mention the entire bug title in the changelog.
> In this case I think a:
> 
>   * New maintainer (Closes: #595541)
> 
> is perfectly fine.
> 
> > [...]
> > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
> > 
> > Kind regards
> > fulapol
> > 
> > Please CC me, i'm not in the list
> > 
> 
> 
> Other than that, I did not really see any issues. :)
> 
> ~Niels
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
> 
> iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJNJax6AAoJEAVLu599gGRCYbUQAI0ljmG4tiOXhSqccGRXNl4E
> mi4ViYCXGt6vgqZAPzNIscWbZtZ2dhXt67cq7aHTAdMfRER4RlAI+/kSYXDyRKwn
> QR/N9zqow1arjdl001GCl7AKcveu5R+HeZiiQqCQwxq7A8ZdUTjiacRBgzTErg77
> jrshbU8vc2GJYdgQpyXroICmh89ItrG/zEHOFoNefRndSSMrsQnbDzcIg00PqCY1
> 0EzoBONhs4Fn9p1s/0dU3Bf15/h/l9Cvi1UP7Mob0W+ziZ9lXADIBN+5ZsWjQo2D
> kfHJKXAinNqTPBP1TtyjZaf9sfL7GdVpcbZoZNV+Q6kynz6ZXvYW4C0iqyqJ5xcw
> qVaBAmqC8Fpb1wYwySW707DP3NqJYDN11UgqoVPgdIEDqQXCWlY1ASoRxuOmIROy
> 5BUiLSds2UQIXHSo/dLxhmeB4fH3CJqMHfEsxAWaLXgvRIMh3EP6VT6axANbsddL
> WwNp98y5UzKVJlcdQeFEq1TKleZMCgVV/hSvnNhgxKkUPPrEvcPRUADf9n3Mo2M0
> gB7ilYfTr4n5kjzmGVaI9rVgZu/jPY/s6Lx34XvgxDZ43J/7ar4+WZmenVkaIcfr
> jfDMTfY9sG3tlfVUN6zYyf9Lu1F3ED4AVXUF/NirmjGjwpvRRlCi7yMmY6RNCYwI
> Jene7BOKfASWUzjLpuoV
> =dEEl
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Ops, a very little (big) mistake I did. Update, and using experimental
as target.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: