Re: RFS: abcl

["Desmond O. Chang" <dochang@gmail.com>]

Hi Darren and Christoph,

On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 20:43, Christoph Egger <christoph@debian.org> wrote:
> Darren Hoo <darren.hoo@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> I am wondering whether it is neccessary to integrate it with
>> common-lisp-controller
>> since abcl is running on JVM, it does not have the schemes like other  CL
>> implementations that support  dumping core/image.
>
> Maybe someone else can help here?

c-l-c has been deprecated in sid now.

I posted a c-l-c redesign plan [1] last month.  In fact, finally,
c-l-c will be *deleted*.  So ABCL *should not* depend on c-l-c.

Generally, all the implementations, which have included ASDF2, don't
have to work with c-l-c and cl-asdf.  For those not including ASDF2,
they can choose:

1. Build-Depends cl-asdf, then load it when compiling the image.
2. PreDepends cl-asdf, then load it when installing the image.
3. Depends cl-asdf, then load it when running the image.
4. patch asdf by themselves.
5. don't include asdf at all.

I don't follow mentors.  Please CC your reply to [2].

Any opinion about c-l-c redesign please reply to that thread [1].

[1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.alioth.common-lisp/2431
[2] pkg-common-lisp-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org

Thanks,
Des