James Goppert <james.goppert@gmail.com> writes:/---
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "open-dis".
>
> * Package name : open-dis
> Version : 2.5-1
> Upstream Author : Don McGregor <mcgredo@users.sourceforge.net>
>
> * URL : http://open-dis.sourceforge.net
> * License : BSD like, with conditions
> Section : libs
>
> It builds these binary packages:
> libdis - Distributed Interactive Simulation Protocol
>
> libdis-dev - Distributed Interactive Simulation Protocol
>
> The package appears to be lintian clean.
>
> The upload would fix these bugs: 593009
| find cpp/DIS/ -name *.h -exec cp -v {} $(CURDIR)/debian/tmp/usr/include/DIS/ \;
| find CppUtils/DIS/ -name *.h -exec cp -v {} $(CURDIR)/debian/tmp/usr/include/DIS/ \;
\---
Any reason you're using find? One could fear you're loosing
directory structure (but there are no directories). A cp -v cpp/DIS/*.h ...
should work as well right?
/---
| % uscan --report-status
| Processing watchfile line for package open-dis...
| Newest version on remote site is enumerations-bin_1.1, local version is 2.5
| open-dis: Newer version (enumerations-bin_1.1) available on remote site:
| http://qa.debian.org/watch/sf.php/open-dis/open-dis-enumerations-bin_1.1.tar.gz
| (local version is 2.5)
\---
I'd propose the following change:
/---
--- debian/watch.orig 2010-08-24 01:16:27.602516565 +0200
+++ debian/watch 2010-08-24 01:16:44.714513820 +0200
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
version=3
-http://sf.net/open-dis/open-dis-(.*)\.tar\.gz
+http://sf.net/open-dis/open-dis-([\d.]*)\.tar\.g
\---
Which changes that to
/---
| % uscan --report-status
| Processing watchfile line for package open-dis...
| Newest version on remote site is 3.0, local version is 2.5
| open-dis: Newer version (3.0) available on remote site:
| http://qa.debian.org/watch/sf.php/open-dis/open-dis-3.0.tar.gz
| (local version is 2.5)
\---
Any reason to not use the up-to-date version?
Regards
Christoph
--
9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731
Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top posting bad?