[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: poppler (updated package)



On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 11:22:38AM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
V> On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 11:20:23 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> > On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 21:03:08 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > > At this point, we should not upload this trivial fix but we need to wait
> > > package migration of poppler.
> > 
> > I agree that this change is trivial (and rather unnecessary), but the
> > release team was insistent (at least with me) that they wouldn't
> > unblock until it was fixed.  It appears that they are less stringent
> > for unblock requests coming directly from DDs.

I do not know ... If you compare:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=592812
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=593435

Mine uses reportbug which makes formatted letter including required
command for archive maintainance (i.e., less work for release team).
Also my request was more explicit than yours citing "RC".  These made
release team to understand importentance of my request without argument
and tilted judgement toward accepting request without question. That is
my take. 

(Once you get some suggestion, you are not expected to argue with
release team.  If they requested, you should have made such package
immediately.)
 
Anyway this is history, please read on.

> > However, I'm not sure if your unblock went through; at least according
> > to the qa page its still blocked [0].

It takes some time to get these archive script to be run.

Now both xpdf 3.02-9 and poppler 0.12.4-1.1 are in testing.

> > > > The previous poppler package that I had sponsored fixed an RC issue by
> > > > versioning a Conflicts entry. The release team wants the corresponding
> > > 
> > > Where is this discussion?
> > 
> > See my freeze exception request: http://bugs.debian.org/592812.
> 
> Actually that doesn't cover the entire discussion.  I had a
> conversation on #debian-release that was more definitive, which I can
> send later.

There may be some good reason behind "Conflicts and Replaces not versioned in
the same way".  Unless you really want to upload poppler 0.12.4-1.2,
let's move on to upload xpdf in nice shape.

 * xpdf 3.02-10 (as planned, please finalize git by tommorow.)

Let poppler maintainer worry fixing cosmetic issues.  There are many.

Osamu


Reply to: