Il 17/08/2010 13:46, Thomas Goirand ha scritto:yes, I agree
IMHO, the problem is rather than upstream is using a silly numbering system. uscan is quite right that 6 is a smaller number than 53, don't you think?I wrote to upstream author before release package but he never reply to me...
If I was you, I would try to get in touch with upstream, and have them change version numbers for something that isn't as silly as now. Debian wont be the only distribution having issues with it!
so I used epoch to relase the package... or should I change version from 1.6 in to 1.60 on dfsg package?
anyway I suppose next relase will be 1.61 and the problem will disappear, at this time I
only want to fix lintian warning, can I use in this case lintian-overrides?
TIA
Alessandro
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature