Re: Multiple ITP's
- To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Multiple ITP's
- From: Chris Baines <cbaines8@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 17:07:03 +0100
- Message-id: <1281974823.3920.3.camel@chris-debian-desktop>
- In-reply-to: <20100816113244.GA5418@richter>
- References: <1281955640.3091.7.camel@chris-debian-desktop> <20100816113244.GA5418@richter>
On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 13:32 +0200, Simon Richter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 11:47:20AM +0100, Chris Baines wrote:
>
> > In my attempt to update the Debian FlightGear packages I have decided it
> > would be best to spilt the FlightGear base package down in to its
> > different components to allow for easier setup.
>
> ITPs are meant for coordinating work on packages not in the archive,
> i.e. where there is no Maintainer (capital M) yet. If an updated
> source package adds new binaries, there is no need for an ITP.
>
> Simon
By "splitting down the base package" I mean creating individual source
packages for the component parts that build there own binary packages,
this is because the component parts have separate version's.
Sorry I was a bit ambiguous,
Chris
Reply to: