Re: Re: RFS: synergy-plus (a fork of synergy which is maintained)
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 3:17 AM, Nick Bolton <nick.bolton.uk@gmail.com> wrote:
> Indeed, we would like to merge back into original synergy, and I agree
> that the best way to get bug fixes to users would be to upload the
> package as synergy... However, our APT was denied:
>
> http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/sourceforge/ticket/11846
>
> That said, just yesterday, I managed to get in touch with Chris S (the
> original project owner). It's too soon to make any predictions, so
> we'll just have to see what happens.
Looks like your takeover request rejection was simply a communications
issue. I think the best approach is to get synergy2.sf.net maintained
again and merge everything from code.g.c/p/synergy-plus into synergy,
then shut down synergy-plus. Ultimately this is the best outcome for
the FLOSS community and is suggested by Debian Social Contract point
2.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Reply to: